China tired of WHO plan for additional COVID-19 origins research | CBC News


China can’t settle for the World Health Organization’s plan for the second section of a research into the origins of COVID-19, a senior Chinese well being official stated Thursday.

Zeng Yixin, the vice minister of the National Health Commission, stated he was “rather taken aback” that the plan consists of additional investigation of the idea that the virus might need leaked from a Chinese lab.

He dismissed the lab leak concept as a hearsay that runs counter to widespread sense and science.

“It is impossible for us to accept such an origin-tracing plan,” he stated at a information convention referred to as to handle the COVID-19 origins situation.

Liang Wannian, the Chinese co-leader of the joint China-WHO investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, speaks at a information convention in Beijing on Thursday. Chinese officers dismiss the idea that the virus might need leaked from a Chinese lab. (Mark Schiefelbein/The Associated Press)

The search for the place the virus got here from has grow to be a diplomatic situation that has fuelled China’s deteriorating relations with the U.S. and plenty of American allies. The U.S. and others say that China has not been clear about what occurred within the early days of the pandemic. China accuses critics of looking for accountable it for the pandemic and politicizing a problem that must be left to scientists.

The Biden administration in a press release Thursday criticized China’s rejection of WHO’s plan for the second section of a research into the origins of COVID-19.

“We are deeply disappointed. Their position is irresponsible and, frankly, dangerous,” the White House stated. “Alongside other member states around the world, we continue to call for China to provide the needed access to data and samples. And this is critical so we can understand to prevent the next pandemic. This is about saving lives in the future, and it’s not a time to be stonewalling.”

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director-general of WHO, acknowledged final week that there had been a “premature push” after the primary section of the research to rule out the idea that the virus might need escaped from a Chinese authorities lab in Wuhan, town the place the illness was first detected in late 2019.

Most specialists do not assume a lab leak is the probably trigger. The query is whether or not the chance is so distant that it must be dropped, or whether or not it deserves additional research.

WATCH Vanity Fair reporter on their investigative piece on the lab-leak concept:

Vanity Fair contributing editor Katherine Eban talks about her months-long investigation into the emergence of the lab-leak theory, why it was dismissed for months, and how efforts to probe it were suppressed within parts of the U.S. government. 6:47

The first phase was conducted earlier this year by an international team of scientists who came to Wuhan to work with their Chinese counterparts. The team was accused of bowing to demands from the Chinese side after it initially indicated that further study wasn’t necessary.

Zeng said the Wuhan lab has no virus that can directly infect humans and noted that the WHO team concluded that a lab leak was highly unlikely. He added that speculation that staff and graduate students at the lab had been infected and might have started the spread of the virus in the city was untrue.

Lab director denies designing novel coronavirus

Yuan Zhiming, the director of the biosafety lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, said they had not stored or studied the new coronavirus before the outbreak.

“I want to emphasize that … the Wuhan Institute of Virology has never designed, made or leaked the novel coronavirus,” he said.

The WHO team concluded that the virus most likely jumped from animals to humans, probably from bats to an intermediate animal. The experts visited markets in Wuhan that had sold live animals, and recommended further study of the farms that supplied the market.

“In the next step, I think animal tracing should still be the priority direction. It is the most valuable field for our efforts,” Liang Wannian, who headed the Chinese side, said at Thursday’s news conference.

WATCH Fauci, Sen. Rand Paul angrily clash July 20 over U.S. funding of research:

At one level saying ‘you have no idea what you’re speaking about,’ a annoyed Dr. Anthony Fauci debated the origins of the coronavirus with Sen. Rand Paul at a Senate committee in Washington. 3:27

Tedros stated final week that he hoped for higher co-operation and entry to knowledge from China. “We are asking China to be transparent, open and co-operate, especially on the information, raw data that we asked for in the early days of the pandemic,” he stated.

His phrases have been echoed on the similar digital information convention by Germany’s well being minister, Jens Spahn, who referred to as on China to accentuate co-operation within the seek for the origin of the virus.

Zeng stated China has at all times supported “scientific virus tracing” and desires to see the research prolonged to different nations and areas. “However, we are opposed to politicizing the tracing work,” he stated.

China has incessantly sought to deflect accusations that the pandemic originated in Wuhan and was allowed to unfold by early bureaucratic missteps and an tried coverup.

Day 610:27Why scientists are reconsidering the lab leak concept of their dedication to know COVID-19’s origins

This week, U.S. President Joe Biden publicly requested intelligence officers to step up their efforts to establish the supply of the COVID-19 outbreak, reinvigorating a longstanding public and scientific debate about whether or not the virus might have leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China. The so-called lab leak concept is controversial, however scientists say it can’t be definitively dominated out. Freelance science journalist Grace Niewijk tells us why the lab leak concept has been getting a lot consideration currently and why determining how the outbreak started is so essential to scientists. 10:27

Government spokespersons have referred to as for an investigation into whether or not the virus might need been produced in a U.S. army laboratory, a concept not extensively shared within the scientific neighborhood.

China has largely ended native transmission of COVID-19 via lockdowns and mask-wearing necessities, and has now administered greater than 1.Four billion doses of Chinese vaccines. Just 12 new domestically unfold instances have been reported Thursday and China says its dying toll from the virus has remained unchanged for months at 4,636.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here